United Kingdom research governance strategy.

نویسندگان

  • Susan Kerrison
  • Nick McNally
  • Allyson M Pollock
چکیده

the UK. London: King’s Fund, 2002. 3 Department of Health. Research and development for a first class service. London: DoH, 2000. www.doh.gov.uk/research/documents/rd3/ first_class_service.pdf (accessed 3 July 2003). 4 Department of Health website. www.doh.gov.uk/research/ (accessed 3 July 2003). 5 Culyer A. Supporting research and development in the NHS. Report of the Department of Health Research and Development Task Force. London: HMSO, 1994. 6 Arnold E,Morrow S, Thuriaux B,Martin B. Implementing the Culyer reforms in North Thames: final report. science and technology policy research. London: Technopolis, 1999. 7 Harrison A, New B. The finance of research and development in health care. Health Care UK 2001: the King’s Fund review of health policy.London: King’s Fund, 2001: 26-44. 8 McCollum C. UK National Health Service R&D funding—a bureaucratic nightmare. Lancet 2003;361:1906. 9 Pharmaceutical Industry Competitiveness Taskforce. Final report. London: DoH, 2001. 10 Pharmaceutical Industry Competitiveness Taskforce. Clinical research report. London: DoH, 2002. 11 Department of Health.NHS Cancer Plan. London: DoH, 2000. 12 National Cancer Research Institute. Strategic analysis 2002. London: NCRI, 2002. http://www.ncri.org.uk/documents/publications/ reportdocs/NCRI_Strategic_Analysis_2002.pdf (accessed 2 July 2003). 13 National Cancer Tissue Resource. www.ntrac.org.uk/Initiatives/NCTR/ NCTR.asp (accessed 8 July 2003). 14 Office of Science and Technology. Public sector research exploitation fund—basic guidelines. www.ost.gov.uk/enterprise/knowledge/ psrefundguide.pdf (accessed 5 August 2003). 15 Department of Health. Science and innovation strategy. London: DoH, 2001. 16 Department of Health. The NHS as an innovative organisation: a framework and guidance on the management of intellectual property in the NHS. London: DoH, 2002. 17 Department of Health. NHS R&D funding consultation paper: NHS support for science. London: DoH, 2000. 18 Department of Health. NHS R&D funding consultation paper: NHS priorities and needs funding. London: DoH, 2000. 19 Department of Health. NHS priorities and needs R&D funding: a position paper. London: DoH, 2001. 20 Kerrison S, McNally N, Pollock AM. United Kingdom research governance strategy. BMJ 2003;327:553-6. 21 Walt G, Brugha R, Haines AWorking with the private sector: the need for institutional guidelines BMJ 2002;325:432-5. 22 Korn D. Conflicts of interest in biomedical research. JAMA 2000;284:2234-8. 23 Morin K, Rakatansky H, Riddick FA Jr, Morse LJ, O’Bannon JM 3rd, Goldrich MS, et al. Managing conflicts of interest in the conduct of clinical trials JAMA 2002;287:78-84. (Accepted 3 June 2003)

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Health Services Research Spending and Healthcare System Impact; Comment on “Public Spending on Health Service and Policy Research in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A Modest Proposal”

The challenges associated with translating health services and policy research (HSPR) evidence into practice are many and long-standing. Indeed, those challenges have themselves spawned new areas of research, including knowledge translation and implementation science. These sub-disciplines have increased our understanding of the critical success factors associated with the uptake of research ev...

متن کامل

Evaluation of Corporate Governance Practices in Emerging Markets (A case study of Nigerian Banking Industry)

This study explores corporate governance practices within the context of the Nigerian banking industry using instances of corporate governance lapses that resulted in part to the Nigerian banking crises. We present multiple case analysis of publicly available documents and court papers (in the United Kingdom and Nigeria) to document instances of breach and areas of weakness in the existing Nige...

متن کامل

A Comparison of Energy Transition Governance in Germany, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom

This paper reviews and analyzes the challenges of energy transition governance towards a low-carbon society as a political achievement. The main research question is how specific “transition governance approaches” (as advocated by transition theory) can be embedded/anchored in the policy-making logics and practices. We analyze three country cases, known for their path-breaking efforts in the ar...

متن کامل

Making Research Matter; Comment on “Public Spending on Health Service and Policy Research in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A Modest Proposal”

We offer a UK-based commentary on the recent “Perspective” published in IJHPM by Thakkar and Sullivan. We are sympathetic to the authors’ call for increased funding for health service and policy research (HSPR). However, we point out that increasing that investment – in any of the three countries they compare: Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom– will ipso facto not necessarily lea...

متن کامل

Public Spending on Health Service and Policy Research in Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States: A Modest Proposal

Health services and policy research (HSPR) represent a multidisciplinary field which integrates knowledge from health economics, health policy, health technology assessment, epidemiology, political science among other fields, to evaluate decisions in health service delivery. Health service decisions are informed by evidence at the clinical, organizational, and policy level, levels with distinct...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • BMJ

دوره 327 7414  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003